Triple
T33761338
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | q-Selberg integral |
E865111
|
entity |
| Predicate | limitAs q→1 |
P6112
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Selberg integral |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Selberg integral | Statement: [q-Selberg integral, limitAs q→1, Selberg integral]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: limitAs q→1 Context triple: [q-Selberg integral, limitAs q→1, Selberg integral]
-
A.
limitaCon
Indicates that one entity imposes a restriction, constraint, or limit on another entity or its behavior.
-
B.
limitDistribution
Indicates that one entity imposes or defines a maximum allowable quantity, range, or rate for another entity or process.
-
C.
limitVolumeAsIterationsGoToInfinity
Indicates that the volume approaches a limiting value as the number of iterations increases without bound.
-
D.
limitBehavior
chosen
Indicates how an entity behaves or changes as it approaches a specified limit or boundary condition.
-
E.
finiteAt
Indicates that a function, quantity, or value remains finite (not infinite or undefined) at a specified point or under a given condition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3498d3b748190aa3c4006c1f32f38 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7051ad6e4819095e82bbd64761803 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:19 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f700fe24e08190998e2c96fbaaad38 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:02 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:45 a.m.