Triple
T33751651
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Omotic–Datooga languages |
E864856
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasWorkingLanguageFamily |
P64460
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Omotic |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Omotic | Statement: [Omotic–Datooga languages, hasWorkingLanguageFamily, Omotic]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasWorkingLanguageFamily Context triple: [Omotic–Datooga languages, hasWorkingLanguageFamily, Omotic]
-
A.
usesLanguageFamily
Indicates that an entity communicates or operates using a language that belongs to a specified language family.
-
B.
usesWorkingLanguagesOf
Indicates that one entity employs or operates using the working languages associated with another entity.
-
C.
isInLanguageFamily
chosen
Indicates that a language belongs to, or is classified within, a particular language family based on shared linguistic ancestry or characteristics.
-
D.
languageFamilyPresence
Indicates that a particular language family is present or attested within a specified region, group, or context.
-
E.
appliesToLanguageFamily
Indicates that something (such as a rule, feature, or classification) is relevant or applicable to an entire language family rather than to a single language.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3498c35f881909df279ae4270f831 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fdec5ffe088190ac5505f26c6cff18 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fdeae15f1c81908fc63fbc1b028d2e |
completed | May 8, 2026, 1:53 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:45 a.m.