Triple

T33735883
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Naga fireball festival E864411 entity
Predicate hasTypeOfPhenomenon P112065 FINISHED
Object unexplained light phenomenon LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unexplained light phenomenon | Statement: [Naga fireball festival, hasTypeOfPhenomenon, unexplained light phenomenon]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypeOfPhenomenon
Context triple: [Naga fireball festival, hasTypeOfPhenomenon, unexplained light phenomenon]
  • A. hasAssociatedPhenomenon
    Indicates that one entity is linked to, or typically occurs together with, a particular phenomenon or observable event.
  • B. examplePhenomenon chosen
    Indicates a representative or illustrative occurrence used to demonstrate or clarify a broader phenomenon or pattern.
  • C. capturesPhenomenon
    Indicates that one entity records, represents, or effectively reflects the occurrence or characteristics of a particular phenomenon.
  • D. affectsPhenomenon
    Indicates that one phenomenon produces an influence or change on another phenomenon.
  • E. encounteredPhenomenon
    Indicates that an entity has come across, experienced, or observed a particular phenomenon.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3498b24b8819096a65009e521d0e1 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff14d596e88190be5263b7f96a96cd completed May 9, 2026, 11:04 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff13f0208081909369aeb3b77a6b1f completed May 9, 2026, 11:01 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:44 a.m.