Triple

T33728363
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Miss Van Schuyler E864205 entity
Predicate attitudeTowardLinnetDoyle P178378 FINISHED
Object envious LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: envious | Statement: [Miss Van Schuyler, attitudeTowardLinnetDoyle, envious]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: attitudeTowardLinnetDoyle
Context triple: [Miss Van Schuyler, attitudeTowardLinnetDoyle, envious]
  • A. attitudeTowardLeninaCrowne
    Indicates the nature or quality of an entity’s feelings, opinions, or stance toward Lenina Crowne.
  • B. attitudeTowardÁntonia
    Indicates the stance, feelings, or evaluative disposition that one entity holds toward Ántonia.
  • C. attitudeTowardHomerSmith
    Indicates the nature or quality of an entity’s feelings, opinions, or stance toward Homer Smith.
  • D. attitudeTowardCorneliaRobson
    Indicates the nature or quality of an entity’s feelings, opinions, or stance toward Cornelia Robson.
  • E. laterAttitudeTowardCathyLinton
    Indicates the attitude or feelings an entity comes to hold toward Cathy Linton at a subsequent point in time, as opposed to an earlier or initial attitude.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3498a64cc8190b4b414c67b280d93 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7107acf0481909b01467b9ebbde01 completed May 3, 2026, 9:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f70f3a54d481909ba6bdda3647b761 completed May 3, 2026, 9:02 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f70fb41a9c8190a121e62e510dc18a completed May 3, 2026, 9:04 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:44 a.m.