Triple

T33718039
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bethlehem area rural cluster E863929 entity
Predicate sharesGeographicTiesWith P200902 FINISHED
Object Bethlehem NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Bethlehem | Statement: [Bethlehem area rural cluster, sharesGeographicTiesWith, Bethlehem]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sharesGeographicTiesWith
Context triple: [Bethlehem area rural cluster, sharesGeographicTiesWith, Bethlehem]
  • A. hasSocialTieWith
    Indicates a social relationship or connection exists between two entities, such as friendship, acquaintance, or other interpersonal tie.
  • B. sharesNotableAssociationWith
    Indicates a mutual, noteworthy connection or linkage between two entities that is significant enough to be recognized or highlighted.
  • C. sharesRitesWith
    Indicates that two entities participate in or observe the same religious, ceremonial, or ritual practices.
  • D. sharesCountryWith
    Indicates that two entities are located in, originate from, or are otherwise associated with the same country.
  • E. sharesProvinceWith
    Indicates that two entities are located within, or associated with, the same administrative province.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f34989871c81908682e22a2fe4b829 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ffb82be8148190a1c870d467a28c80 completed May 9, 2026, 10:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ffb7bbd550819094052e9a0d0ae320 completed May 9, 2026, 10:39 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ffb82b40788190bf401344a3f288dd completed May 9, 2026, 10:41 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:44 a.m.