Triple
T33704304
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SP |
E863541
|
entity |
| Predicate | isSuccessorInTraditionTo |
P177222
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Welfare Party |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Welfare Party | Statement: [SP, isSuccessorInTraditionTo, Welfare Party]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isSuccessorInTraditionTo Context triple: [SP, isSuccessorInTraditionTo, Welfare Party]
-
A.
traditionInheritedFrom
Indicates that a tradition has been passed down or derived from an earlier source, group, or culture.
-
B.
isApostolicSuccessorOf
Indicates that one person holds an office or authority in a direct, legitimate line of succession from another, typically through an unbroken chain of ordinations or appointments.
-
C.
isApostolicSuccessorIn
Indicates that one entity holds the role or office of an apostolic successor within a specified jurisdiction, tradition, or context.
-
D.
hasStatusInTradition
Indicates that an entity holds a particular recognized status or standing within a specified tradition or traditional framework.
-
E.
foundedInTradition
Indicates that something is established, developed, or grounded within a particular tradition or set of longstanding customary practices.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3498844608190bb8f9b14908d2510 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6fae2a7a8819099945d1706a94bfd |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6f96dd4c8819093d6a7bd046a9ad5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:29 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6fa335b908190a20d92d5396203b5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:33 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:43 a.m.