Triple

T33703012
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Daniel (Love Actually) E863508 entity
Predicate hasChildInCare P196960 FINISHED
Object Sam (Love Actually) NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sam (Love Actually) | Statement: [Daniel (Love Actually), hasChildInCare, Sam (Love Actually)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasChildInCare
Context triple: [Daniel (Love Actually), hasChildInCare, Sam (Love Actually)]
  • A. hasChildCare
    Indicates that an entity provides, offers, or is associated with child care services or facilities for children.
  • B. legalStatusAsChildOf
    Indicates that one entity holds a specific legal status or recognition in relation to being the child of another entity.
  • C. hasParentalUnit
    Indicates that an entity has a parent or guardian that serves as its primary caregiving or parental figure.
  • D. hasFosterFamily
    Indicates that an entity is placed with and cared for by a foster family, rather than its original or biological family.
  • E. hasChildWhoBecame
    Indicates that an entity has a child who later attained or transitioned into a specified role, status, or condition.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3498844608190bb8f9b14908d2510 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe6fea4a288190bf8615c5d6bf41b4 completed May 8, 2026, 11:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe6f774de08190975a2393b9a1fd22 completed May 8, 2026, 11:19 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe6fe98e38819085100ce4c6cee5b8 completed May 8, 2026, 11:21 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:43 a.m.