Triple

T33699740
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Table Manners E863420 entity
Predicate hasTrilogyCompanionPlay P199561 FINISHED
Object Living Together NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Living Together | Statement: [Table Manners, hasTrilogyCompanionPlay, Living Together]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTrilogyCompanionPlay
Context triple: [Table Manners, hasTrilogyCompanionPlay, Living Together]
  • A. hasTrilogy
    Indicates that an entity is part of, or associated with, a specific trilogy within a larger set of works or narratives.
  • B. hasTrilogyCompanionWorkEnglish
    Indicates that an English-language work is associated with another work as part of a trilogy companion relationship.
  • C. hasPartInTrilogy
    Indicates that an entity is one of the constituent parts (e.g., books, films, or episodes) that together form a specific trilogy.
  • D. hasSequelInTrilogy
    Indicates that one work in a trilogy is followed by another work that serves as its sequel within that same three-part series.
  • E. hasCompanionFilm
    Indicates that one film is officially paired with another as a companion work, intended to be viewed or understood together.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3498723a08190ac034339cc78eade completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff45793d5c81909dc503ad1f714ee2 completed May 9, 2026, 2:32 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff41cb0e088190a6e9b03cb20e5fad completed May 9, 2026, 2:16 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ff45782cb88190b604811e4d724382 completed May 9, 2026, 2:32 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:43 a.m.