Triple

T33682464
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Lord (Reprise) E862937 entity
Predicate revisitsThemesOf P162502 FINISHED
Object Seven Psalms NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Seven Psalms | Statement: [The Lord (Reprise), revisitsThemesOf, Seven Psalms]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: revisitsThemesOf
Context triple: [The Lord (Reprise), revisitsThemesOf, Seven Psalms]
  • A. revisitsThemeOf chosen
    Indicates that one work, section, or passage returns to and further explores a theme that was previously introduced elsewhere.
  • B. tacklesTheme
    Indicates that one entity addresses, explores, or deals with a particular theme as a central subject.
  • C. themeRevived
    Indicates that an entity is brought back to life, restored, or reactivated as the central participant or focus of an event or action.
  • D. notableTheme
    Indicates that a particular theme is prominently featured in, or strongly associated with, an entity such as a work, event, or body of content.
  • E. thematicConcept
    Indicates that one entity embodies, expresses, or is centrally concerned with a particular underlying theme or conceptual idea represented by the other entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3498662b48190904442c39df84fb7 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6fa6028d88190a94185bfbb96a888 completed May 3, 2026, 7:33 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6f96dd4c8819093d6a7bd046a9ad5 completed May 3, 2026, 7:29 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:43 a.m.