Triple

T3366896
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Episcopal Diocese of Montana E70857 entity
Predicate usesClericalVestments P38265 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Episcopal Diocese of Montana, usesClericalVestments, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesClericalVestments
Context triple: [Episcopal Diocese of Montana, usesClericalVestments, yes]
  • A. hasClericalVestments
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with the clerical vestments (religious garments) of another entity.
  • B. usesAlsoLiturgy
    Indicates that an entity additionally employs or follows a particular liturgy alongside its primary or other liturgical practices.
  • C. requiresVestments chosen
    Indicates that performing the related action or role necessitates wearing specific ceremonial or official vestments.
  • D. aimsForLiturgicalUse
    Indicates that something is intended or designed specifically for use in liturgical or formal religious worship contexts.
  • E. hasLiturgicalPosture
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific bodily posture or position used in a liturgical or religious ritual context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85a729d48190afd789cd8417f289 completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb287a30c8190b4c40091675c94fb completed March 8, 2026, 5:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ada4317e288190ab7d0f66e9dba65f completed March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:13 p.m.