Triple
T3366168
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nuneaton |
E70840
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRiver |
P165
|
FINISHED |
| Object | River Anker |
E494886
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: River Anker | Statement: [Nuneaton, hasRiver, River Anker]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: River Anker Context triple: [Nuneaton, hasRiver, River Anker]
-
A.
River Anker
chosen
The River Anker is a small river in central England that flows through Warwickshire and Staffordshire, including the town of Tamworth, before joining the River Tame.
-
B.
River Peover
River Peover is a small river in Cheshire, England, that flows through rural countryside before joining the River Weaver.
-
C.
River Gade
The River Gade is a chalk stream in Hertfordshire, England, flowing through towns such as Hemel Hempstead and Kings Langley before joining the River Colne.
-
D.
Tsna River
The Tsna River is a significant river in western Russia that flows through the Tambov and Ryazan regions before joining the Oka River.
-
E.
River Roch
The River Roch is a waterway in Greater Manchester, England, that flows through the town of Rochdale and has historically supported its local industry and settlement.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85a729d48190afd789cd8417f289 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb287a30c8190b4c40091675c94fb |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:31 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69becf8388f8819090829c206f4080a2 |
completed | March 21, 2026, 5:04 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:13 p.m.