Triple

T33645310
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Edward Sheffield E861944 entity
Predicate emotionallyHauntedBy P15512 FINISHED
Object failed marriage LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: failed marriage | Statement: [Edward Sheffield, emotionallyHauntedBy, failed marriage]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: emotionallyHauntedBy
Context triple: [Edward Sheffield, emotionallyHauntedBy, failed marriage]
  • A. haunts chosen
    Indicates that one entity persistently appears in, lingers around, or psychologically troubles another entity or place, often in a recurring or unsettling way.
  • B. emotionallyAttachedTo
    Indicates that one entity has a strong emotional bond, affection, or dependence directed toward another entity.
  • C. feltIn
    Indicates that a sensation, emotion, or effect is experienced within a particular location, context, or entity.
  • D. emotionalCoreOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as the central source, essence, or primary driver of another entity’s emotional character or experience.
  • E. hasEmotionalDimension
    Indicates that something involves, expresses, or affects emotions as a significant aspect of its nature or impact.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3498280c48190bcc3494017d14234 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6fb19063c81909466b329655c8583 completed May 3, 2026, 7:36 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6f96badb08190994442c2aba840b1 completed May 3, 2026, 7:29 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:42 a.m.