Triple
T33635513
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | People v. Pratt |
E861679
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPostConvictionFinding |
P198633
|
FINISHED |
| Object | exculpatory evidence had been withheld from the defense |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: exculpatory evidence had been withheld from the defense | Statement: [People v. Pratt, hasPostConvictionFinding, exculpatory evidence had been withheld from the defense]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPostConvictionFinding Context triple: [People v. Pratt, hasPostConvictionFinding, exculpatory evidence had been withheld from the defense]
-
A.
hasHadCriminalConviction
Indicates that an entity has previously been found guilty of a criminal offense through a legal process.
-
B.
convictedOf
Indicates that a person or entity has been found guilty of committing a specified offense or crime through a formal legal process.
-
C.
hasFirstConviction
Indicates that an entity has received its first legal conviction for an offense.
-
D.
convictedAs
Indicates that a person has been formally found guilty and sentenced in a specific role or capacity (e.g., as a particular type of offender) in a legal proceeding.
-
E.
convictedBy
Indicates that an authority, typically a court or judge, has formally found an entity guilty of a crime or offense.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34981c54c81909b33c3fa2208a52d |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fef8c3f2388190b995ec173512945a |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:05 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fef65975608190960b78d27e806d4f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:54 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fef8c2cdd881908c6f44e4dfa5ffd0 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:05 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:42 a.m.