Triple
T33635511
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | People v. Pratt |
E861679
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDefenseClaim |
P191393
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Geronimo Pratt was innocent |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Geronimo Pratt was innocent | Statement: [People v. Pratt, hasDefenseClaim, Geronimo Pratt was innocent]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDefenseClaim Context triple: [People v. Pratt, hasDefenseClaim, Geronimo Pratt was innocent]
-
A.
claimsToDefend
Indicates that one entity asserts or professes that its actions or stance are intended to protect or uphold another entity or value.
-
B.
isDefendedOn
Indicates that one entity provides protection, justification, or support for another entity in a specific context or situation.
-
C.
hasBeenDefendedIn
chosen
Indicates that something (such as a claim, thesis, or position) has been supported or argued for in a particular context, event, or venue.
-
D.
hasClaimOn
Indicates that one entity holds a right, entitlement, or demand over another entity or its resources.
-
E.
hasDefenseStrategy
Indicates that an entity employs or is associated with a particular plan or set of measures designed to protect against threats or attacks.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34981c54c81909b33c3fa2208a52d |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fef3ceef648190b58027c93d757438 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fef359da2c819091a034387b08821f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:42 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:42 a.m.