Triple
T33635510
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | People v. Pratt |
E861679
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasProsecutionTheory |
—
|
GENERATED |
| Object | Geronimo Pratt participated in a robbery-murder |
—
|
UNRECOGNIZED GENERATED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProsecutionTheory Context triple: [People v. Pratt, hasProsecutionTheory, Geronimo Pratt participated in a robbery-murder]
-
A.
prosecutionTheory
chosen
Indicates the explanation or narrative put forward by the prosecution about how and why the alleged offense occurred.
-
B.
hasTheory
Indicates that an entity possesses, is associated with, or is characterized by a particular theory.
-
C.
counselForProsecution
Indicates that an entity serves as a legal representative or advisor acting on behalf of the prosecution in a legal proceeding.
-
D.
hasProsecutorType
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific category or type of prosecutor involved in a legal matter.
-
E.
mayProsecute
Indicates that one party has the legal authority or permission to initiate and conduct prosecution against another party.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34981c54c81909b33c3fa2208a52d |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:42 a.m.