Triple
T33631172
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Irene Emerson |
E861563
|
entity |
| Predicate | transferredLegalInterestInDredScottTo |
P198810
|
FINISHED |
| Object | John F. A. Sandford |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: John F. A. Sandford | Statement: [Irene Emerson, transferredLegalInterestInDredScottTo, John F. A. Sandford]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: transferredLegalInterestInDredScottTo Context triple: [Irene Emerson, transferredLegalInterestInDredScottTo, John F. A. Sandford]
-
A.
legalStatusInDredScottCase
Indicates the legal status or classification an entity held within the context of the Dred Scott Supreme Court case.
-
B.
jurisdictionTransferred
Indicates that legal authority or control over a matter, case, or entity has been moved from one jurisdiction to another.
-
C.
transferredAppellateJurisdictionFrom
Indicates that appellate jurisdiction or authority over a case or legal matter has been moved from one court or body to another.
-
D.
notableSupremeCourtCase
Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
-
E.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34981c54c81909b33c3fa2208a52d |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff0b6bc4a88190bf1d38c6ea26bcdc |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff082a22f4819095ded971dbd8ea7b |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:10 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ff0b6a541c8190a6fa847552f3491f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 10:24 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:41 a.m.