Triple
T33622076
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Asteliaceae |
E861298
|
entity |
| Predicate | describedInTaxonomicSystem |
P35623
|
FINISHED |
| Object | APG III system |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: APG III system | Statement: [Asteliaceae, describedInTaxonomicSystem, APG III system]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: describedInTaxonomicSystem Context triple: [Asteliaceae, describedInTaxonomicSystem, APG III system]
-
A.
describedByTaxon
Indicates that something is characterized, defined, or otherwise described by a particular taxonomic concept or classification.
-
B.
usedTaxonomicSystem
chosen
Indicates that a particular taxonomic classification system was applied or followed when organizing or identifying the entities involved.
-
C.
describedTaxon
Indicates that an entity (such as a publication or description) formally describes or establishes the referenced taxon.
-
D.
hasTaxonomicDescriptions
Indicates that an entity is associated with one or more formal taxonomic descriptions that define or characterize its classification.
-
E.
taxonomicStatus
Indicates the formal classification status of a taxon within a taxonomic system, such as whether it is accepted, synonymized, provisional, or invalid.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34980fabc81909819228729a9ca84 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcef654d588190b29ecc76678d1aa0 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcecdb97f48190b382b7d13be92dc0 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 7:49 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:41 a.m.