Triple
T33605096
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Grameen microfinance model |
E860825
|
entity |
| Predicate | implementationContext |
P86121
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rural communities |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rural communities | Statement: [Grameen microfinance model, implementationContext, rural communities]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: implementationContext Context triple: [Grameen microfinance model, implementationContext, rural communities]
-
A.
integrationContext
Indicates the contextual framework or environment within which multiple components, systems, or processes are combined and interact as an integrated whole.
-
B.
implementedInContextOf
chosen
Indicates that something (such as a method, feature, or process) is carried out or realized within a particular surrounding situation, framework, or set of conditions.
-
C.
implementationDomain
Indicates the domain, field, or context within which something is implemented or put into practical use.
-
D.
implementationTarget
Indicates that one entity serves as the concrete implementation or realization of another entity’s specification, interface, or design.
-
E.
implementationType
Indicates the specific manner or approach by which something is implemented or realized in practice.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3498037c88190a4500f002b5540e0 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f70fb4f18c819099ef6d9177b7d205 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70f3a54d481909ba6bdda3647b761 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 9:02 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:41 a.m.