Triple

T33599364
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mark (Love Actually) E860672 entity
Predicate confessesLoveTo P40219 FINISHED
Object Juliet (Love Actually) NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Juliet (Love Actually) | Statement: [Mark (Love Actually), confessesLoveTo, Juliet (Love Actually)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: confessesLoveTo
Context triple: [Mark (Love Actually), confessesLoveTo, Juliet (Love Actually)]
  • A. romanticallyObsessedWith
    Indicates a strong, often overwhelming romantic fixation or preoccupation that one entity has toward another.
  • B. loveInterestPortrayedBy
    Indicates that a character’s romantic interest is depicted or played by a particular actor or performer.
  • C. confesses chosen
    Indicates that one entity openly admits or acknowledges something, typically a wrongdoing, secret, or previously concealed fact, to another entity.
  • D. rumoredLoverOf
    Indicates that one entity is widely believed or speculated to be the romantic partner or lover of another entity, without confirmed evidence.
  • E. fellInLoveWith
    Indicates that one entity developed romantic love or deep affectionate feelings toward another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3497f35908190a2e9bbb9b96c7a3f completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fb563aec448190875410fb1a3ed624 completed May 6, 2026, 2:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fb35b9ede881908aaae93a215525df completed May 6, 2026, 12:36 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:41 a.m.