Triple

T33599329
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Juliet (Love Actually) E860671 entity
Predicate weddingVideoRecordedBy P141703 FINISHED
Object Mark (Love Actually) NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mark (Love Actually) | Statement: [Juliet (Love Actually), weddingVideoRecordedBy, Mark (Love Actually)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: weddingVideoRecordedBy
Context triple: [Juliet (Love Actually), weddingVideoRecordedBy, Mark (Love Actually)]
  • A. wasRecordedBy chosen
    Indicates that an event, observation, or piece of data was captured or documented by a specific agent, instrument, or recording process.
  • B. hasWeddingSceneWith
    Indicates that two entities appear together in a wedding scene within the same context or work.
  • C. weddingRole
    Indicates the specific role or function an entity has in the context of a wedding event.
  • D. recordingOf
    Indicates that one entity is an audio or video capture or performance that documents, represents, or preserves another entity (such as a work, event, or expression).
  • E. bride
    Indicates that an entity is a woman who is getting married or has just been married in relation to a wedding event or spouse.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3497f35908190a2e9bbb9b96c7a3f completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6f7a8225881908c37c08c3cc86928 completed May 3, 2026, 7:22 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6f6632dfc8190af85e258c8519207 completed May 3, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:41 a.m.