Triple

T33598528
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jadis E860643 entity
Predicate laterLanguageStyle P115652 FINISHED
Object more conventional English (as Anne) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: more conventional English (as Anne) | Statement: [Jadis, laterLanguageStyle, more conventional English (as Anne)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterLanguageStyle
Context triple: [Jadis, laterLanguageStyle, more conventional English (as Anne)]
  • A. styleLanguage
    Indicates a relationship where one entity specifies the language or linguistic style in which another entity is expressed, formatted, or presented.
  • B. laterTraditionsLanguage chosen
    Indicates that later traditions or sources refer to or describe the subject using the specified language.
  • C. stylisticRange
    Indicates the range or spectrum of styles that characterize or can be applied to something.
  • D. laterLanguageOfServices
    Indicates that one language is used for services at a later time or stage than another language.
  • E. suffixLanguage
    Indicates that one language is used as a suffix or ending element in the formation or representation of another language or linguistic expression.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3497f35908190a2e9bbb9b96c7a3f completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fff09dae088190bd8460060d778feb completed May 10, 2026, 2:42 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fff0027c5c8190baa5c7a15852cbe0 completed May 10, 2026, 2:40 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:41 a.m.