Triple
T33593558
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Scalphunters |
E860496
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasThematicStyle |
P61999
|
FINISHED |
| Object | distinct thematic style within Circus |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: distinct thematic style within Circus | Statement: [Scalphunters, hasThematicStyle, distinct thematic style within Circus]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasThematicStyle Context triple: [Scalphunters, hasThematicStyle, distinct thematic style within Circus]
-
A.
hasThematicOrigin
Indicates that something originates from, or is thematically derived from, a particular source, subject, or theme.
-
B.
isThemedTo
Indicates that one entity is designed, styled, or conceptually based around the subject, motif, or theme represented by another entity.
-
C.
hasThemeType
Indicates that something is associated with or characterized by a particular thematic category or type.
-
D.
hasCentralTheme
Indicates that one entity serves as the primary or dominant theme or subject matter of another entity.
-
E.
hasThemingDetail
chosen
Indicates that something includes or is associated with a specific thematic element, motif, or stylistic detail.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497e70e48190951c94d072879bec |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f760a35b988190904e6267553ad2fe |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f75eb3d6f081908c933474eb359e3d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:41 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:41 a.m.