Triple
T33575601
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | A minor |
E860021
|
entity |
| Predicate | harmonicMinorScale |
P142447
|
FINISHED |
| Object | A B C D E F G♯ |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: A B C D E F G♯ | Statement: [A minor, harmonicMinorScale, A B C D E F G♯]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: harmonicMinorScale Context triple: [A minor, harmonicMinorScale, A B C D E F G♯]
-
A.
hasHarmonicMinorVariant
chosen
Indicates that one musical element (such as a scale, key, or melody) has a corresponding form that is derived from or expressed in the harmonic minor variant.
-
B.
diatonicScale
Indicates that a musical element (such as a note, chord, or melody) belongs to or is derived from a specific diatonic scale.
-
C.
hasMelodicMinorVariant
Indicates that one musical element (such as a scale, motif, or passage) has a corresponding version based on the melodic minor form of that element.
-
D.
enharmonicEquivalent
Indicates that two musical notes, intervals, or keys sound the same in pitch but are written differently in notation.
-
E.
scaleDegree7
Indicates that one musical pitch or chord functions as the seventh scale degree in relation to a given tonal center or key.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497d37848190afcbb5ef3f5c7376 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6f74b95248190a3546b33dda2402d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6f6632dfc8190af85e258c8519207 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:40 a.m.