Triple
T33574907
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hole in Your Soul |
E860003
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasBandMemberAsComposer |
P192586
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Benny Andersson |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Benny Andersson | Statement: [Hole in Your Soul, hasBandMemberAsComposer, Benny Andersson]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasBandMemberAsComposer Context triple: [Hole in Your Soul, hasBandMemberAsComposer, Benny Andersson]
-
A.
hasMusicalComposer
Indicates that one entity serves as the musical composer responsible for creating the music associated with another entity.
-
B.
hasCoComposer
Indicates that an entity shares authorship of a musical composition with one or more other composers.
-
C.
hasBandMember
Indicates that a musical group includes a specific individual as one of its members.
-
D.
hasGenreAsComposer
Indicates that an entity, in its role as a composer, is associated with a specific musical or artistic genre.
-
E.
hasNotableComposer
Indicates that an entity is associated with a composer who is recognized as particularly significant or distinguished.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497d37848190afcbb5ef3f5c7376 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd19f791f48190bbb6f6047f9ddc59 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 11:02 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd0df365948190bc9bfc7ffd46acd8 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 10:10 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd19f6a7888190aa7eee2b87687c53 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 11:02 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:40 a.m.