Triple
T33571190
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | South Band Pawnee |
E859904
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pawnee language variety |
C58290
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Pawnee language variety Context triple: [South Band Pawnee, instanceOf, Pawnee language variety]
-
A.
Kickapoo language variety
A Kickapoo language variety is a specific dialect or form of the Kickapoo language, distinguished by its unique phonological, lexical, and grammatical features used by particular Kickapoo-speaking communities.
-
B.
Yavapai language variety
A Yavapai language variety is a specific form or dialect of the Yavapai language, distinguished by unique phonological, lexical, or grammatical features used by a particular Yavapai-speaking community.
-
C.
Arapaho language
The Arapaho language is an Algonquian language traditionally spoken by the Arapaho people of the Great Plains, now primarily in Wyoming and Oklahoma, and is the focus of ongoing revitalization efforts.
-
D.
Southern Athabaskan language
A Southern Athabaskan language is a member of the Athabaskan branch of the Na-Dené language family spoken primarily in the Southwestern United States and northern Mexico, characterized by complex verb morphology and tonal or pitch-accent features.
-
E.
Patwin language variety
The Patwin language variety is a group of closely related dialects of the Patwin branch of the Wintuan language family, traditionally spoken by the Patwin people of north-central California.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497c1d288190a844ea699914e038 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:40 a.m.