Triple

T33569808
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Roman bridge of Salamanca E859862 entity
Predicate isTouristPhotoSpot P176896 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Roman bridge of Salamanca, isTouristPhotoSpot, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isTouristPhotoSpot
Context triple: [Roman bridge of Salamanca, isTouristPhotoSpot, yes]
  • A. isTouristDestination
    Indicates that a place is recognized as a location people commonly visit for leisure, sightseeing, or travel.
  • B. hasTouristAttractionRole
    Indicates that an entity serves in the capacity or function of a tourist attraction for another entity (such as a place, organization, or area).
  • C. isTourismSiteIn
    Indicates that a tourism site is located within or belongs to a specified geographic or administrative area.
  • D. isLandmarkFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as a notable or significant reference point or attraction for another entity, such as a place, route, or area.
  • E. isPopularAttraction
    Indicates that something is widely liked, frequently visited, or highly regarded as an attraction in a particular context or location.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3497c1d288190a844ea699914e038 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6f8164698819090c1b471f1caa4c6 completed May 3, 2026, 7:24 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6f6632dfc8190af85e258c8519207 completed May 3, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6f70b0ca081908b24a98937e6ef66 completed May 3, 2026, 7:19 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:40 a.m.