Triple
T33566975
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | UTM |
E859785
|
entity |
| Predicate | datumCompatibility |
P177428
|
FINISHED |
| Object | WGS84 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: WGS84 | Statement: [UTM, datumCompatibility, WGS84]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: datumCompatibility Context triple: [UTM, datumCompatibility, WGS84]
-
A.
projectionCompatibility
Indicates that two or more projections (such as views, mappings, or representations) are mutually consistent and can be combined or used together without conflict.
-
B.
checksCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity evaluates whether it is compatible or can function harmoniously with another entity.
-
C.
requiresCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity can only function correctly or be used if it is compatible with another specified entity.
-
D.
logicalCompatibilityWith
Indicates that two entities can coexist, interact, or be combined without contradiction under a given set of logical rules or assumptions.
-
E.
regionCompatibility
Indicates that two entities are suitable or allowed to coexist, operate, or interact within the same geographic or jurisdictional region.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497c1d288190a844ea699914e038 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6fb93224881908fc66fe76115fcdb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:38 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6f96badb08190994442c2aba840b1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:29 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6fb17d5ec81909091e37e1ddbe577 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:36 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:40 a.m.