Triple

T33559631
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The First Meetings E859579 entity
Predicate hasLyricalPersona P45598 FINISHED
Object first-person narrator LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: first-person narrator | Statement: [The First Meetings, hasLyricalPersona, first-person narrator]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLyricalPersona
Context triple: [The First Meetings, hasLyricalPersona, first-person narrator]
  • A. hasRecurringLyricalPersona
    Indicates that an artist or author repeatedly uses the same or a very similar character, voice, or narrative persona across multiple lyrical or poetic works.
  • B. hasLyricalStyle
    Indicates that one entity possesses or is characterized by a particular lyrical style in relation to another entity or context.
  • C. lyricalCharacter chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the character or persona expressed or portrayed in the lyrics of the other entity (such as a song or poem).
  • D. hasLyricalTheme
    Indicates that one entity (typically a creative work) features or is characterized by a particular lyrical subject, topic, or theme.
  • E. hasLyricalLanguage
    Indicates that something (such as a text or expression) employs poetic, expressive, or highly figurative language.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3497b2b68819093207971b5e13dc8 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6f711c5508190b8d93ce933508f1a completed May 3, 2026, 7:19 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6f6632dfc8190af85e258c8519207 completed May 3, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:40 a.m.