Triple
T33544123
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sam Masterson |
E859156
|
entity |
| Predicate | rekindles |
P176872
|
FINISHED |
| Object | buried secrets |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: buried secrets | Statement: [Sam Masterson, rekindles, buried secrets]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rekindles Context triple: [Sam Masterson, rekindles, buried secrets]
-
A.
revival
Indicates the act of bringing something back into use, popularity, or active existence after a period of decline, dormancy, or disuse.
-
B.
reivindica
Indicates that an entity asserts a right to, claims ownership of, or demands recognition or restitution for something.
-
C.
relives
Indicates that one entity experiences again or re-experiences a past event, situation, or emotion associated with another entity.
-
D.
renews
Indicates that one entity extends, refreshes, or restores the validity, duration, or effectiveness of another entity, often continuing a prior agreement, state, or condition.
-
E.
reintroduced
Indicates that an entity that was previously removed, extinct, or absent has been brought back or restored to a place, context, or state.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497a5be08190a39b12736899e034 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6f8164698819090c1b471f1caa4c6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6f6632dfc8190af85e258c8519207 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6f70b0ca081908b24a98937e6ef66 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:19 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:39 a.m.