Triple
T33543001
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Conrad Smith |
E859123
|
entity |
| Predicate | representedEra |
P198555
|
FINISHED |
| Object | All Blacks dominant era of 2000s and 2010s |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: All Blacks dominant era of 2000s and 2010s | Statement: [Conrad Smith, representedEra, All Blacks dominant era of 2000s and 2010s]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: representedEra Context triple: [Conrad Smith, representedEra, All Blacks dominant era of 2000s and 2010s]
-
A.
representsEra
Indicates that one entity designates the historical era, period, or age to which another entity belongs or is associated.
-
B.
partOfEra
Indicates that one entity exists as a temporal segment or component within the duration or scope of a larger historical era.
-
C.
endedEra
Indicates that one entity brought about or marked the conclusion of a particular era associated with another entity.
-
D.
livedInEra
Indicates that an entity existed or was active during a particular historical era or time period.
-
E.
proposedEra
Indicates that one entity has suggested or put forward a particular era or time period as relevant or applicable to another entity or context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497a5be08190a39b12736899e034 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fef2db323c8190821bda53f22a42be |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:39 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fef21d63c88190abf6a99b59b3c655 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:36 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fef2da7d388190a5712a5094741f18 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 8:39 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:39 a.m.