Triple
T33521169
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Greater Manchester (historic county Cheshire) |
E858503
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasHistoricalCountyBoundaryWith |
P58874
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Greater Manchester (historic county Lancashire) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Greater Manchester (historic county Lancashire) | Statement: [Greater Manchester (historic county Cheshire), hasHistoricalCountyBoundaryWith, Greater Manchester (historic county Lancashire)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHistoricalCountyBoundaryWith Context triple: [Greater Manchester (historic county Cheshire), hasHistoricalCountyBoundaryWith, Greater Manchester (historic county Lancashire)]
-
A.
hasHistoricCountyStatusSince
Indicates that an entity has held the legal or recognized status of a historic county starting from a specified point in time.
-
B.
hasHistoricCountyExtentSimilarTo
Indicates that one entity’s historic county boundaries closely resemble or match those of another entity.
-
C.
hasAssociatedHistoricCounty
Indicates that an entity is linked to a specific historic county with which it is geographically or administratively associated.
-
D.
historicalCounty
Indicates that an entity was located within or associated with a county as it existed in the past, even if that county’s boundaries or administrative status have since changed.
-
E.
bordersHistoricCounty
chosen
Indicates that one historic county shares a boundary with another historic county.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349781c6c819082c516b260efe7e2 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fed48d8e148190a99c0aea29f8a3ee |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:30 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fed3c82a24819095e614e31ac0307f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:27 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:39 a.m.