Triple
T3351762
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gilbert Islands |
E70511
|
entity |
| Predicate | wasBritishProtectorate |
P34080
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Gilbert Islands, wasBritishProtectorate, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wasBritishProtectorate Context triple: [Gilbert Islands, wasBritishProtectorate, true]
-
A.
wasUnderTrusteeshipOf
Indicates that one entity was administered, overseen, or managed under the legal or formal trusteeship authority of another entity.
-
B.
protectorateEstablishedBy
Indicates that a protectorate relationship was formally created or instituted by a particular actor or authority.
-
C.
wasProtectorateOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity was formerly under the protection and partial control of another, typically more powerful, entity.
-
D.
wasColonialPower
Indicates that one entity historically exercised colonial control or dominance over another entity.
-
E.
formerColonyName
Indicates that one entity is the historical or previous name used for a colony that later changed its political status or designation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85a4ef7c8190a29e2bbd6fa454e4 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb221a7d8819086cd0f826eca0fe8 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ada42fbe7c8190b9f185b5ab985f17 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:12 p.m.