Triple

T33513669
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Qualification Directive E858309 entity
Predicate recastEnteredIntoForce P177057 FINISHED
Object 2011 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2011 | Statement: [Qualification Directive, recastEnteredIntoForce, 2011]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: recastEnteredIntoForce
Context triple: [Qualification Directive, recastEnteredIntoForce, 2011]
  • A. charterEnteredIntoForce
    Indicates that a charter has become legally effective and binding as of a specific point in time.
  • B. recastIn
    Indicates that an entity has been assigned or transformed into a new role, form, or representation, replacing or altering its previous casting or configuration.
  • C. recast
    Indicates that an entity is assigned a new role or form, replacing a previous assignment or interpretation in a given context.
  • D. recastBy
    Indicates that an existing role, character, or part has been newly assigned to a different performer or entity than before.
  • E. recastOf
    Indicates that one entity is a new or different version, adaptation, or reinterpretation of another, typically replacing or redoing the original in a similar role or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3497721848190978fbee5e0a526f8 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6f85bfba48190aba95b40642a8ca7 completed May 3, 2026, 7:25 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6f6619404819084662aef1238261c completed May 3, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6f814fcf48190ae4504154d1b2c05 completed May 3, 2026, 7:24 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:39 a.m.