Triple
T33513189
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Prüm Convention |
E858299
|
entity |
| Predicate | enteredIntoForceForInitialStates |
P180677
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2007 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2007 | Statement: [Prüm Convention, enteredIntoForceForInitialStates, 2007]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: enteredIntoForceForInitialStates Context triple: [Prüm Convention, enteredIntoForceForInitialStates, 2007]
-
A.
enteredIntoForceIn
Indicates that an agreement, law, or treaty became legally effective or operative in a specified place or jurisdiction.
-
B.
enteredIntoForce
Indicates that a law, treaty, agreement, or regulation has become legally effective and binding from a specific point in time.
-
C.
enteredIntoForceBy
Indicates that a legal instrument, agreement, or provision became legally effective as a result of an action taken by a specified authority, event, or instrument.
-
D.
enteredIntoForceBetween
Indicates that a legal agreement, treaty, or regulation has become legally binding and effective between the specified parties or jurisdictions.
-
E.
enteredIntoForceInContextOf
Indicates that a legal instrument, agreement, or provision became legally binding and effective within a specified contextual framework, such as a particular jurisdiction, treaty system, or procedural setting.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497721848190978fbee5e0a526f8 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7465687bc8190a9da44d62b634ed7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f743f4ceb08190a21fe7f4a99b166b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:47 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f74654c09c819084879162eba9d641 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:57 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:39 a.m.