Triple
T33512859
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | EU conventions |
E858293
|
entity |
| Predicate | areLegallyBindingOn |
P26796
|
FINISHED |
| Object | European Union member states |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: European Union member states | Statement: [EU conventions, areLegallyBindingOn, European Union member states]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: areLegallyBindingOn Context triple: [EU conventions, areLegallyBindingOn, European Union member states]
-
A.
decisionsAreBindingOn
Indicates that the decisions made by one party or authority must be accepted and followed by another party as legally or formally obligatory.
-
B.
hasLegalForceAs
Indicates that one thing possesses the binding legal effect or validity in the capacity or role of another specified thing.
-
C.
hasLegalForceIn
chosen
Indicates that something (such as a law, regulation, or agreement) is legally valid, binding, and enforceable within a specified jurisdiction or context.
-
D.
legalIn
Indicates that an action, status, or entity is permitted or valid under the laws or regulations of a specified jurisdiction.
-
E.
hasLegalEffect
Indicates that an action, document, or condition produces recognized legal consequences or enforceable rights and obligations.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497721848190978fbee5e0a526f8 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6f8164698819090c1b471f1caa4c6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6f6619404819084662aef1238261c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:39 a.m.