Triple
T33498395
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | High Commissioner of India to Canada |
E857923
|
entity |
| Predicate | isStyleUsedIn |
P81832
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Commonwealth of Nations |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Commonwealth of Nations | Statement: [High Commissioner of India to Canada, isStyleUsedIn, Commonwealth of Nations]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isStyleUsedIn Context triple: [High Commissioner of India to Canada, isStyleUsedIn, Commonwealth of Nations]
-
A.
usesAsStyleOf
Indicates that one entity adopts or applies another entity as a stylistic model, method, or manner of expression.
-
B.
hasStyle
Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular style or manner.
-
C.
styleNameUsage
chosen
Indicates how a particular style name is applied or used in relation to an entity or context.
-
D.
usedStyle
Indicates that one entity employed or applied a particular style, method, or manner associated with another entity.
-
E.
usedWithStyle
Indicates that something is employed or applied in conjunction with a particular style or stylistic manner.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497660508190a541826a81f7e9ab |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6e56cfb0c8190a911312571616b06 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6e3db74c081909a991309d835d477 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:38 a.m.