Triple
T3349666
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cynic school |
E70458
|
entity |
| Predicate | attitudeTowardPossessions |
P47391
|
FINISHED |
| Object | embrace of poverty |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: embrace of poverty | Statement: [Cynic school, attitudeTowardPossessions, embrace of poverty]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: attitudeTowardPossessions Context triple: [Cynic school, attitudeTowardPossessions, embrace of poverty]
-
A.
ownershipCharacteristic
Indicates that one entity possesses a particular quality, attribute, or condition specifically in its role as an owner of another entity.
-
B.
typicallyHolds
Indicates that a certain relationship or condition generally holds true in typical or normal situations, though not necessarily in all cases.
-
C.
valuedBy
Indicates that one entity is regarded as important, useful, or held in high esteem by another entity.
-
D.
recognizedPossession
Indicates that an entity formally acknowledges or accepts another entity’s ownership or control over something.
-
E.
attitudeToQiyas
Indicates the stance or position an entity holds toward the use or validity of qiyas (analogical reasoning).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85a4ef7c8190a29e2bbd6fa454e4 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adb21f3ae48190a33530712da01bc3 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ada42df1d48190874bb05f95deefde |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ada52716ec81908e89688a81039394 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 4:34 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:12 p.m.