Triple
T33482295
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kennewick–Richland metropolitan area |
E857509
|
entity |
| Predicate | adminCenterCounty |
P23957
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Benton County, Washington |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Benton County, Washington | Statement: [Kennewick–Richland metropolitan area, adminCenterCounty, Benton County, Washington]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: adminCenterCounty Context triple: [Kennewick–Richland metropolitan area, adminCenterCounty, Benton County, Washington]
-
A.
hasCountyAdministration
Indicates that an entity is governed, managed, or served by a specific county-level administrative authority.
-
B.
hasCountyAdministrator
Indicates that an entity is administered or overseen by a specific county administrator.
-
C.
adminCenterLocatedOn
Indicates that the administrative center of an entity is situated on or within a specified geographic or physical feature.
-
D.
inCounty
chosen
Indicates that one entity is geographically or administratively located within the boundaries of a specified county.
-
E.
districtAdministration
Indicates that an entity is responsible for managing, governing, or overseeing the administrative affairs of a specific district or local jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497547608190a1a0f2365fb713ee |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd783fed9c81909e792702636c4f1f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd7788e63c81909de22fdafcfe41c0 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:41 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:38 a.m.