Triple

T33431652
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Brighton Miracle E856145 entity
Predicate JapanPreviousLargestWorldCupDefeatYear P180183 FINISHED
Object 1995 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1995 | Statement: [Brighton Miracle, JapanPreviousLargestWorldCupDefeatYear, 1995]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: JapanPreviousLargestWorldCupDefeatYear
Context triple: [Brighton Miracle, JapanPreviousLargestWorldCupDefeatYear, 1995]
  • A. JapanPreviousLargestWorldCupDefeatScore
    Indicates the scoreline of the heaviest defeat Japan had suffered in any previous World Cup match before the match in question.
  • B. JapanPreviousWorldCupWinYear
    Indicates the year in which Japan most recently won the FIFA World Cup prior to a given reference point.
  • C. JapanPreviousWorldCupWinOpponent
    Indicates the opposing team that Japan defeated in its most recent prior FIFA World Cup victory.
  • D. JapanWorldCupWinsBeforeMatch
    Indicates the number of World Cup victories Japan had achieved prior to the referenced match.
  • E. largestWorldCupDefeatOpponent
    Indicates the opposing team against which an entity suffered its largest margin of defeat in a FIFA World Cup match.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349709e7881908c342b4d34f555f4 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f73223675481908c1bc3208c0f5284 completed May 3, 2026, 11:31 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7317690108190b3aae2cd2e1d069e completed May 3, 2026, 11:28 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f73221eef88190bd8905e6e9f5a586 completed May 3, 2026, 11:31 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:36 a.m.