Triple

T33420073
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Parliamentary constituency system of Bermuda E855822 entity
Predicate linkedToPartySystem P82265 FINISHED
Object two-party dominant system in Bermuda LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: two-party dominant system in Bermuda | Statement: [Parliamentary constituency system of Bermuda, linkedToPartySystem, two-party dominant system in Bermuda]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: linkedToPartySystem
Context triple: [Parliamentary constituency system of Bermuda, linkedToPartySystem, two-party dominant system in Bermuda]
  • A. associatedWithPartySystem chosen
    Indicates that an entity is linked or connected to a particular party system, such as a political or organizational party structure.
  • B. belongsToPartySide
    Indicates that an entity is affiliated with or aligned to a particular side or faction within a party or group.
  • C. connectsTypeOfParties
    Indicates a relationship that specifies which types of parties are linked or associated with each other.
  • D. componentParty
    Indicates that one party functions as a constituent or member of a larger party or group within a composite relationship.
  • E. arePartyTo
    Indicates that the entities are participants or signatories in the same agreement, contract, or legal arrangement.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3496fdf0081908c1aa30870ce518b completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fdbaa226708190b8ed96e93aad38de completed May 8, 2026, 10:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fdb58b07e48190837e00966de050d4 completed May 8, 2026, 10:06 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:36 a.m.