Triple

T33405126
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Luther, Obama’s Anger Translator E855416 entity
Predicate toneContrastWithObama P176866 FINISHED
Object angry vs calm LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: angry vs calm | Statement: [Luther, Obama’s Anger Translator, toneContrastWithObama, angry vs calm]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: toneContrastWithObama
Context triple: [Luther, Obama’s Anger Translator, toneContrastWithObama, angry vs calm]
  • A. achievesContrast
    Indicates that one entity creates or enhances a visual or conceptual difference relative to another entity.
  • B. tempoContrast
    Indicates a relationship where two musical passages or sections differ in tempo, highlighting a contrast in their speed or pacing.
  • C. textureContrast
    Indicates a relationship where two surfaces or regions differ noticeably in their tactile or visual texture qualities.
  • D. contrastEffect
    Indicates that one entity’s characteristics are perceived or evaluated differently because they are compared or juxtaposed with another entity.
  • E. hasToneContrast
    Indicates a relationship where two tones differ in pitch, contour, or phonological features such that they form a perceptible tonal contrast.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3496f04a08190804e56ac5098b8e4 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6f38159d08190980ad639e08f00f4 completed May 3, 2026, 7:04 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6e3d7bee48190b94e0beb48a1d7fa completed May 3, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6f37f36ac8190b1bff8711d6771cb completed May 3, 2026, 7:04 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:36 a.m.