Triple
T33402598
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Punk's Dead: SLC Punk 2 |
E855346
|
entity |
| Predicate | revisitsSubculture |
P176863
|
FINISHED |
| Object | punk |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: punk | Statement: [Punk's Dead: SLC Punk 2, revisitsSubculture, punk]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: revisitsSubculture Context triple: [Punk's Dead: SLC Punk 2, revisitsSubculture, punk]
-
A.
basedOnSubculture
Indicates that something is derived from, influenced by, or rooted in a particular subculture.
-
B.
notableSubculture
Indicates that one entity is a significant or well-recognized subculture within the context or domain of the other entity.
-
C.
influencedSubculture
Indicates that one entity has had a shaping or significant impact on the development, style, or practices of a particular subculture.
-
D.
culturalRevival
Indicates efforts or processes aimed at restoring, revitalizing, or strengthening cultural practices, traditions, or identities that have declined or been suppressed.
-
E.
hasSubcultureDebate
Indicates that there is an ongoing or notable debate, disagreement, or contested discourse within or about a particular subculture.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3496e3f1c8190bcecfa82aa9d17ff |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6f38159d08190980ad639e08f00f4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6e3d7bee48190b94e0beb48a1d7fa |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6f37f36ac8190b1bff8711d6771cb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:04 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:36 a.m.