Triple
T33397031
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ITRS |
E855198
|
entity |
| Predicate | consistencyWith |
P29598
|
FINISHED |
| Object | celestial reference systems |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: celestial reference systems | Statement: [ITRS, consistencyWith, celestial reference systems]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: consistencyWith Context triple: [ITRS, consistencyWith, celestial reference systems]
-
A.
hasConsistency
Indicates that one entity maintains a stable, uniform, or coherent state, behavior, or set of properties in relation to another entity or over time.
-
B.
consistentWith
chosen
Indicates that one entity does not contradict and is compatible or in agreement with another entity, condition, or set of constraints.
-
C.
requiresForConsistency
Indicates that one element must be present or satisfied for another element to remain logically or functionally consistent.
-
D.
logicalCompatibilityWith
Indicates that two entities can coexist, interact, or be combined without contradiction under a given set of logical rules or assumptions.
-
E.
isEquiconsistentWith
Indicates that two formal theories or systems have the same consistency strength, such that if one is consistent then the other is also consistent, and if one is inconsistent then so is the other.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3496e3f1c8190bcecfa82aa9d17ff |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6f38159d08190980ad639e08f00f4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:04 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6e3d7bee48190b94e0beb48a1d7fa |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:57 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:35 a.m.