Triple
T33384226
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ngāti Kurī |
E854867
|
entity |
| Predicate | traditionalWaka |
P90582
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Kurahaupō |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Kurahaupō | Statement: [Ngāti Kurī, traditionalWaka, Kurahaupō]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionalWaka Context triple: [Ngāti Kurī, traditionalWaka, Kurahaupō]
-
A.
otherGreatHaikuMasters
Indicates that an entity is among the additional or alternative great haiku masters associated with another referenced entity.
-
B.
hasWaka
chosen
Indicates that an entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a waka (such as a traditional canoe, vessel, or similarly defined object).
-
C.
isTraditional
Indicates that something adheres to long-established customs, practices, or norms rather than modern or innovative ones.
-
D.
isTraditionalFormOf
Indicates that one entity is the historically established or customary version from which another, typically more modern or variant, form is derived.
-
E.
honkanStyle
Indicates a relationship where something follows or exhibits the characteristics of the Honkan style (a specific stylistic or design convention).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3496d54048190a1cb91fdd7caa6ea |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fedd5a5f4c8190acce88db56303703 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 7:08 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fed910b31c8190ae837163d146738d |
completed | May 9, 2026, 6:49 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:35 a.m.