Triple

T33382386
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Umonhonti E854817 entity
Predicate traditionallyGuardedBy P79175 FINISHED
Object Omaha religious leaders LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Omaha religious leaders | Statement: [Umonhonti, traditionallyGuardedBy, Omaha religious leaders]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionallyGuardedBy
Context triple: [Umonhonti, traditionallyGuardedBy, Omaha religious leaders]
  • A. historicallyGuardedBy chosen
    Indicates that an entity was protected or defended by another entity during a past historical period.
  • B. guardedIn
    Indicates that one entity is protected or kept under watch within the bounds or premises of another entity.
  • C. typicalGuard
    Indicates that an entity commonly or characteristically serves in a guarding or protective role relative to another entity or context.
  • D. traditionallyOneOf
    Indicates that something is customarily or historically considered to belong to a specific set, category, or group.
  • E. isTraditionallyOccupiedBy
    Indicates that a place, territory, or role has historically and customarily been inhabited or held by a particular group or type of entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3496d54048190a1cb91fdd7caa6ea completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fed83b1d188190a318b0ad3003200a completed May 9, 2026, 6:46 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fed78e03548190b6e6ad93ae8d131d completed May 9, 2026, 6:43 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:35 a.m.