Triple

T33367097
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject municipality of Fribourg E854383 entity
Predicate hasHistoricBridges P198173 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [municipality of Fribourg, hasHistoricBridges, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHistoricBridges
Context triple: [municipality of Fribourg, hasHistoricBridges, true]
  • A. isHistoricBridgeOf
    Indicates that a bridge has historical significance and serves or served as a notable crossing associated with a particular place or route.
  • B. chronologicallyBridges
    Indicates a temporal relationship where one event, period, or entity spans across and connects two or more distinct points or intervals in time.
  • C. hasBridgeAndTrestleStructures
    Indicates that the subject includes or features both bridge and trestle structural elements.
  • D. isOldestSurvivingBridgeAcross
    Indicates that a bridge is the most ancient still-existing bridge that spans a specified waterway, road, or gap.
  • E. FourFamousAncientBridgesWith
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with a set or group of four notable and historically significant ancient bridges.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3496bda8c8190bfc8fade9d1b791c completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69feced53a7c819098ec474fb7d514b0 completed May 9, 2026, 6:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fecd9cd5288190aac8b4e04a7ee78e completed May 9, 2026, 6:01 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69feced436a48190b761db7df2d6b6bd completed May 9, 2026, 6:06 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:35 a.m.