Triple
T33366967
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | LTFS |
E854381
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Linear Tape File System |
C58253
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Linear Tape File System Context triple: [LTFS, instanceOf, Linear Tape File System]
-
A.
tape file system
chosen
A tape file system is a method of organizing, storing, and accessing data on magnetic tape using a structured directory and file layout to enable sequential or indexed retrieval.
-
B.
FAT file system
A FAT file system is a simple, widely supported disk file system that organizes and manages files using a File Allocation Table to track the location and allocation status of data clusters on storage media.
-
C.
FAT file system variant
A FAT file system variant is a specific implementation or extension of the File Allocation Table architecture that defines how data is organized, stored, and managed on storage media, often differing in cluster size limits, maximum volume and file sizes, and supported features.
-
D.
tape storage product family
A tape storage product family is a cohesive line of magnetic tape–based data storage solutions that share a common architecture, features, and management ecosystem to provide scalable, cost-effective, and reliable long-term data retention.
-
E.
flash-friendly file system
A flash-friendly file system is a storage management system designed to optimize performance, wear leveling, and reliability on flash memory devices by minimizing random writes and efficiently handling erase-block constraints.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3496bda8c8190bfc8fade9d1b791c |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:35 a.m.