Triple
T33362241
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 錢 |
E854251
|
entity |
| Predicate | variantSurnameRomanization |
P135924
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Chien |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chien | Statement: [錢, variantSurnameRomanization, Chien]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: variantSurnameRomanization Context triple: [錢, variantSurnameRomanization, Chien]
-
A.
surnameRomanization
Indicates that one entity is the romanized (Latin-alphabet) form of another entity's surname.
-
B.
nameInLanguageRomanization
Indicates that an entity’s name is represented in the romanized (Latin-script) form of a particular language.
-
C.
romanizationVariantOf
chosen
Indicates that one written form is a different romanized representation of the same underlying word or expression as another.
-
D.
hasRomanizationOf
Indicates that one entity is a romanized representation (written in the Latin alphabet) of the other entity’s original script form.
-
E.
languageOfSurnameVariants
Indicates the language in which particular surname variants are used or originate.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3496bda8c8190bfc8fade9d1b791c |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6e3156ea48190b604e414665ef351 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6de0b9ba48190887c9eb5d06a2e94 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:34 a.m.