Triple
T33340818
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Wild Thoughts |
E853661
|
entity |
| Predicate | sampledWorkFeaturedArtist |
P178100
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Product G&B |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Product G&B | Statement: [Wild Thoughts, sampledWorkFeaturedArtist, The Product G&B]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sampledWorkFeaturedArtist Context triple: [Wild Thoughts, sampledWorkFeaturedArtist, The Product G&B]
-
A.
workFeaturedArtist
Indicates that a creative work includes a particular artist in a special or highlighted role (e.g., as a featured performer or collaborator).
-
B.
sampledArtist
Indicates that one artist has used a portion of another artist’s work (a sample) in their own creation.
-
C.
remixFeaturedArtist
Indicates that an artist is credited as a featured performer on a specific remix version of a work.
-
D.
hasFeaturedArtist
Indicates that an entity (such as a song or track) includes another artist who appears as a featured performer.
-
E.
featuresVariousArtists
Indicates that something (typically a creative work) includes contributions from multiple distinct artists rather than a single primary artist.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3496a1a588190bad9cbe9221144e0 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f70c53062c8190b4cb7be22ab00bc7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70abe43e08190b2a30930d96247c1 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:43 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f70b94784c8190970d654e066eb50d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:47 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:34 a.m.