Triple
T33334787
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Inviolata church |
E853505
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasInteriorDecorationFeature |
P6655
|
FINISHED |
| Object | stucco decoration |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: stucco decoration | Statement: [Inviolata church, hasInteriorDecorationFeature, stucco decoration]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInteriorDecorationFeature Context triple: [Inviolata church, hasInteriorDecorationFeature, stucco decoration]
-
A.
hasRichInteriorDecoration
Indicates that an entity features elaborate, ornate, or luxuriously detailed interior decoration.
-
B.
hasInteriorFeature
chosen
Indicates that an entity contains or includes a specific feature within its interior space.
-
C.
interiorDecoratedBy
Indicates that the interior of a space or structure has been designed or decorated by a specific agent or entity.
-
D.
interiorStyle
Indicates that one entity has a particular interior design style or aesthetic characterized by the other entity.
-
E.
hasInteriorItem
Indicates that one entity contains another entity as an item located within its interior.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34969614c81909cd99661b0902533 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ffe01c9d3c819084c256bb3c81c0dc |
completed | May 10, 2026, 1:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ffdfcc78b08190aa4493f13d62a531 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 1:30 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:34 a.m.